For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
This lecture is part of Ecologies of Private Law Lecture Series (ACT): Digital Justice It is a collaboration between six prominent centers for research at the University of Amsterdam: the Paul Scholten Centre for Jurisprudence (PSC), the research priority area Human(e) AI, the Amsterdam Center on the Legal Professions and Access to Justice (ACLPA), the research initiative Digital Transformation of Decision Making (DTDM), the Amsterdam Centre for Transformative Private Law (ACT), and the Institute for Information Law (IViR). The legal domain is being fundamentally transformed by the introduction of new digital technologies. Digitization promises to promote efficiency, objectivity, and ease of use in adjudication, legal practice, and the administration of justice. At the same time, concerns have been raised about issues such as algorithmic bias, digital illiteracy, and threats to judicial autonomy. The Digital Justice Lecture Series aims to offer a space for critical reflection on the future of law and legal practice.
Event details of Co-production: Lecture by Nathalie Smuha (KU Leuven) 'Reconciling algorithmic regulation and the rule of law: banality or impossibility?'
Date
11 November 2022
Time
15:30 -17:00

Governments are increasingly deploying algorithmic systems to inform or take administrative acts of both individual and general nature. The use of algorithmic regulation often has the explicit aim of rendering the law’s implementation and enforcement more efficient, thereby seemingly contributing to the rule of law. At the same time, many examples unfortunately demonstrated that governments’ reliance on algorithmic regulation can hamper the rule of law, and even lead to a rule by law approach instead. In this lecture, Nathalie Smuha will examine whether and to which extent algorithmic regulation can be reconciled with the rule of law, pointing out the challenges that need to be considered. She will discuss the interwovenness of the rule of law with human rights and democracy, and the need to protect these values in algorithmic context, not only from an individual- but also a societal-interest perspective. Finally, she will argue that more attention should be paid to the impact of algorithmic regulation on society’s normative, political and legal infrastructure, especially in the long term.

Registration

Please register here