Raciaal sociaal contract: Mills vs Rawls
Abstract
Classical liberal philosophers such as Locke and Kant are accused of philosophical racism: their theories are said to be inherently racist. Contemporary political philosopher John Rawls is also under fire. According to Charles Mills, Rawls' model of the social contract involves a racial contract. It is constructed from a one-sided white perspective: Rawls' theory of justice is silent about the fundamental injustice that marks the modern world: racial injustice. This essay addresses questions such as: To what extent is Mills' critique correct? Is liberalism inherently racist? Can the social contract be emancipated?